Skip to main content
NFRisk Non-Financial Risk advisory Start a Conversation
NFR-0102 Evidence-controlled risk scenario

JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

When position defence overwhelmed legitimate market formation

The CFTC found reckless concentrated swaps trading—not the valuation process itself—to be manipulative conduct.

Conduct & Governance Risk Data & Control Integrity Conduct risk

Documented impact

$100m CFTC civil monetary penalty
Market, clearing or systemic impact More than 90% of the day's net market volume in the relevant index

Authoritative findings

The documented event

The CFTC's order concerned a Synthetic Credit Portfolio with a net notional value of more than $51 billion at the end of 2011. As the portfolio deteriorated, CIO traders sold more than $7 billion net of the IG9 10-year index on 29 February 2012, including $4.6 billion during three hours and more than 90% of that day's net market volume. The CFTC found that the concentrated selling recklessly disregarded the danger to legitimate market pricing forces and imposed a $100 million civil monetary penalty.

Hypothetical institutional scenario

How might the same control pattern appear?

A large position deteriorates and a trading desk uses exceptional market volume to defend it, while independent control functions cannot stop position management becoming market-conduct risk.

Stress-test questions

Questions for challenge and assurance

  1. Risk committee

    Who can constrain a desk when position concentration becomes market conduct risk?

  2. Operations

    Are marks, limits and price testing independently challenged?

  3. Audit

    Do escalation thresholds respond to market share as well as P&L?

NFRisk practitioner interpretation

Control implication

NFRisk view: valuation challenge, limit governance, concentration monitoring and conduct escalation must remain independent of the desk whose position they constrain.

Evidence register

Primary and supporting sources

  1. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    Order Instituting Proceedings: JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (opens in a new tab) 16 October 2013 · Authoritative primary source

  2. US Commodity Futures Trading Commission

    CFTC Files and Settles Charges Against JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., for Manipulative Conduct in London Whale Swaps Trades (opens in a new tab) 16 October 2013 · Authoritative primary source

Publication note

A documented external event—not an NFRisk client engagement.

The named organisations are included because authoritative sources document the event. Their inclusion does not imply that they are or were NFRisk clients, that they endorse this analysis, or that NFRisk participated in the event or response. Framework relevance and NFRisk practitioner interpretation are analytical layers applied after the event.

Return to the Risk Scenario Library

From scenario to mandate

Test the equivalent control assumption in your environment.

NFRisk can use this scenario as a starting point for a focused structural diagnostic, risk-architecture review or delivery-assurance discussion.

Start a conversation